The Red Sox and Liverpool Are Smart to Ride the SPAC Wave, , on October 15, 2020 at 6:03 am

By ILP
On 10/15/2020
Tags:

(Bloomberg Opinion) — The playbook for making sports teams more valuable is, in theory, quite straightforward: Invest adequately in the playing squad, improve commercial revenue with better stadiums and expanded merchandising, and bank on broadcasting rights becoming more expensive.The practice tends to be more complicated, particularly in European soccer. Even if you execute the business plan perfectly, the final play — of finding an exit, a buyer who will crystallize the value ascribed to the club on paper — is often the hardest. After all, if the commercial potential is already being fully exploited, then the team’s subsequent worth is determined purely by on-field performance, which can fluctuate from one year to the next. That’s a risky proposition for any buyer.Fenway Sports Group LLC may have found a solution: The owner of Major League Baseball’s Boston Red Sox and the English Premier League’s Liverpool Football Club is in talks to be acquired by the blank-check firm RedBall Acquisition Corp. The deal could see Fenway receiving close to $1.5 billion in return for a stake of between 20% and 25%, according to Axios.It would be a very canny move for John W. Henry II, the billionaire who is Fenway’s biggest shareholder. In one fell swoop he would likely make back all the capital he spent acquiring the Red Sox and Liverpool, in return for selling a minority stake. The baseball franchise was valued at $660 million when Fenway bought it as part of a consortium in 2002. The company paid just 300 million pounds ($476 million at the time) for Liverpool in 2010. It also has a majority stake in the New England Sports Network, a cable station, the Nascar team Roush Fenway Racing and a management company that counts basketball star Lebron James among its clients.Henry’s timing is impeccable because Liverpool is currently riding high. Whereas American sports franchises’ revenue streams depend relatively little on their teams’ form, and therefore enjoy more stable valuations, soccer teams’ fortunes quite literally rise or fall with their success in competitions.Qualifying for European competitions can add 100 million pounds in annual revenue. English teams that fail to qualify can see sales drop by 20%, Deloitte estimates. If a team finishes toward the bottom of the Premier League and is relegated to the lower division, its income can drop to 57 million pounds a year, or 10% of the top clubs’ revenue, according to Deloitte. That’s one reason why Henry and the Glazer family, which controls Manchester United Plc, are shamelessly proposing a new league structure that would cement their financial dominance and reduce the likelihood of their teams getting relegated.Considering Liverpool won England’s Premier League this year and the continental Champions League competition last year, there is no better time to cash in on the investment. And using a special-purpose acquisitions company, or SPAC, to do so is smart. Public market investors have long been wary of investing in soccer teams in particular, and with good reason: Manchester United, an admittedly poorly run club, has returned just 1% a year to investors since its 2012 initial public offering.The SPAC structure gives investors a little more protection, and the ability to back out, while also generously rewarding its sponsors to do the deal. Yet life as a publicly traded sports team can be tough. Public market investors generally have less patience than their private cousins, and it did take Henry a decade to bring success to Liverpool. One can imagine that some proceeds of the sale might be used to invest in improving the soccer team’s Anfield stadium. Adding more teams in other countries or new sports to the group might be a good way to hedge against less successful seasons at one of the clubs.Investors might take confidence from the impressive roster of directors put together by RedBall: As executive chairman of the Premier League for 20 years, Richard Scudamore turned it into a global commercial behemoth; and Billy Beane brings his sporting acumen as the general manager of the Oakland Athletics, where he won fame for his early adoption of data analysis in the sport, known as sabermetrics.SPACs have become wildly popular over the past 12 months as volatile trading has made initial public offerings a riskier proposition. They may also provide a convenient goal for other soccer club owners seeking an exit.This column does not necessarily reflect the opinion of the editorial board or Bloomberg LP and its owners.Alex Webb is a Bloomberg Opinion columnist covering Europe’s technology, media and communications industries. He previously covered Apple and other technology companies for Bloomberg News in San Francisco.For more articles like this, please visit us at bloomberg.com/opinionSubscribe now to stay ahead with the most trusted business news source.©2020 Bloomberg L.P.,

The Red Sox and Liverpool Are Smart to Ride the SPAC Wave(Bloomberg Opinion) — The playbook for making sports teams more valuable is, in theory, quite straightforward: Invest adequately in the playing squad, improve commercial revenue with better stadiums and expanded merchandising, and bank on broadcasting rights becoming more expensive.The practice tends to be more complicated, particularly in European soccer. Even if you execute the business plan perfectly, the final play — of finding an exit, a buyer who will crystallize the value ascribed to the club on paper — is often the hardest. After all, if the commercial potential is already being fully exploited, then the team’s subsequent worth is determined purely by on-field performance, which can fluctuate from one year to the next. That’s a risky proposition for any buyer.Fenway Sports Group LLC may have found a solution: The owner of Major League Baseball’s Boston Red Sox and the English Premier League’s Liverpool Football Club is in talks to be acquired by the blank-check firm RedBall Acquisition Corp. The deal could see Fenway receiving close to $1.5 billion in return for a stake of between 20% and 25%, according to Axios.It would be a very canny move for John W. Henry II, the billionaire who is Fenway’s biggest shareholder. In one fell swoop he would likely make back all the capital he spent acquiring the Red Sox and Liverpool, in return for selling a minority stake. The baseball franchise was valued at $660 million when Fenway bought it as part of a consortium in 2002. The company paid just 300 million pounds ($476 million at the time) for Liverpool in 2010. It also has a majority stake in the New England Sports Network, a cable station, the Nascar team Roush Fenway Racing and a management company that counts basketball star Lebron James among its clients.Henry’s timing is impeccable because Liverpool is currently riding high. Whereas American sports franchises’ revenue streams depend relatively little on their teams’ form, and therefore enjoy more stable valuations, soccer teams’ fortunes quite literally rise or fall with their success in competitions.Qualifying for European competitions can add 100 million pounds in annual revenue. English teams that fail to qualify can see sales drop by 20%, Deloitte estimates. If a team finishes toward the bottom of the Premier League and is relegated to the lower division, its income can drop to 57 million pounds a year, or 10% of the top clubs’ revenue, according to Deloitte. That’s one reason why Henry and the Glazer family, which controls Manchester United Plc, are shamelessly proposing a new league structure that would cement their financial dominance and reduce the likelihood of their teams getting relegated.Considering Liverpool won England’s Premier League this year and the continental Champions League competition last year, there is no better time to cash in on the investment. And using a special-purpose acquisitions company, or SPAC, to do so is smart. Public market investors have long been wary of investing in soccer teams in particular, and with good reason: Manchester United, an admittedly poorly run club, has returned just 1% a year to investors since its 2012 initial public offering.The SPAC structure gives investors a little more protection, and the ability to back out, while also generously rewarding its sponsors to do the deal. Yet life as a publicly traded sports team can be tough. Public market investors generally have less patience than their private cousins, and it did take Henry a decade to bring success to Liverpool. One can imagine that some proceeds of the sale might be used to invest in improving the soccer team’s Anfield stadium. Adding more teams in other countries or new sports to the group might be a good way to hedge against less successful seasons at one of the clubs.Investors might take confidence from the impressive roster of directors put together by RedBall: As executive chairman of the Premier League for 20 years, Richard Scudamore turned it into a global commercial behemoth; and Billy Beane brings his sporting acumen as the general manager of the Oakland Athletics, where he won fame for his early adoption of data analysis in the sport, known as sabermetrics.SPACs have become wildly popular over the past 12 months as volatile trading has made initial public offerings a riskier proposition. They may also provide a convenient goal for other soccer club owners seeking an exit.This column does not necessarily reflect the opinion of the editorial board or Bloomberg LP and its owners.Alex Webb is a Bloomberg Opinion columnist covering Europe’s technology, media and communications industries. He previously covered Apple and other technology companies for Bloomberg News in San Francisco.For more articles like this, please visit us at bloomberg.com/opinionSubscribe now to stay ahead with the most trusted business news source.©2020 Bloomberg L.P.

,

Contact Us

Please use our Instant Quote form to see if you're pre-qualified for a non-recourse stock loan, or if you have any questions or feedback, please email, call or chat with us.

deals@internationalliquiditypartners.com

+44 20 3994 1588

Headquarters: Hunkins Waterfront Plaza, Charlestown, Nevis

Open 24 hours a day / 7 days a week / 365 days a year

 

 

 

Frequently Asked Questions

What Is Securities-Based Lending?
Securities-based lending, or a stock loan, is the practice of using market investments such as stocks, ETF’s, warrants, bonds, or real estate investment trusts as collateral for a loan.
How much money can I get for my securities?
Borrow up to 80% of the value of your pledged investments giving you the capital you need to expand your business, purchase real estate, or tackle a costly project.
What happens if my securities lose value?
With a non-recourse stock loan, you can walk away from your securities at any time and keep the loan money with no negative credit consequences even if the investments lose value.
Is my information safe with ILP?
We pride ourselves on outstanding service and make client confidentiality our top priority. You can always be absolutely certain your information is safe with us.
How long does it take for the disbursement of funds?
Most of the transactions we process take less than 7 days from application to the disbursement of funds giving you cash quickly when you need it most.
What credit score do I need to qualify?
There are no credit checks or personal guarantees necessary with our services. Your pledged securities are the only collateral required for the loan you receive.

Instant Quote

Please fill out your information to see if you are pre-qualified.

Enter the Stock Symbol.

Select the Exchange.

Select the Type of Security.

Please enter your First Name.

Please enter your Last Name.

Please enter your phone number.

Please enter your Email Address.

Please enter or select the Total Number of Shares you own.

Please enter or select the Desired Loan Amount you are seeking.

Please select the Loan Purpose.

Please select if you are an Officer/Director.

International Liquidity Partners, LLC may only offer certain information to persons who are “Accredited Investors” and/or “Qualified Clients” as those terms are defined under applicable Federal Securities Laws. In order to be an “Accredited Investor” and/or a “Qualified Client”, you must meet the criteria identified in ONE OR MORE of the following categories/paragraphs numbered 1-20 below.

International Liquidity Partners, LLC cannot provide you with any information regarding its Loan Programs or Investment Products unless you meet one or more of the following criteria. Furthermore, Foreign nationals who may be exempt from qualifying as a U.S. Accredited Investor are still required to meet the established criteria, in accordance with International Liquidity Partners, LLC’s internal lending policies. International Liquidity Partners, LLC will not provide information or lend to any individual and/or entity that does not meet one or more of the following criteria:

1) Individual with Net Worth in excess of $1.0 million. A natural person (not an entity) whose net worth, or joint net worth with his or her spouse, at the time of purchase exceeds $1,000,000 USD. (In calculating net worth, you may include your equity in personal property and real estate, including your principal residence, cash, short-term investments, stock and securities. Your inclusion of equity in personal property and real estate should be based on the fair market value of such property less debt secured by such property.)

2) Individual with $200,000 individual Annual Income. A natural person (not an entity) who had individual income of more than $200,000 in each of the preceding two calendar years, and has a reasonable expectation of reaching the same income level in the current year.

3) Individual with $300,000 Joint Annual Income. A natural person (not an entity) who had joint income with his or her spouse in excess of $300,000 in each of the preceding two calendar years, and has a reasonable expectation of reaching the same income level in the current year.

4) Corporations or Partnerships. A corporation, partnership, or similar entity that has in excess of $5 million of assets and was not formed for the specific purpose of acquiring an interest in the Corporation or Partnership.

5) Revocable Trust. A trust that is revocable by its grantors and each of whose grantors is an Accredited Investor as defined in one or more of the other categories/paragraphs numbered herein.

6) Irrevocable Trust. A trust (other than an ERISA plan) that (a)is not revocable by its grantors, (b) has in excess of $5 million of assets, (c) was not formed for the specific purpose of acquiring an interest, and (d) is directed by a person who has such knowledge and experience in financial and business matters that such person is capable of evaluating the merits and risks of an investment in the Trust.

7) IRA or Similar Benefit Plan. An IRA, Keogh or similar benefit plan that covers only a single natural person who is an Accredited Investor, as defined in one or more of the other categories/paragraphs numbered herein.

8) Participant-Directed Employee Benefit Plan Account. A participant-directed employee benefit plan investing at the direction of, and for the account of, a participant who is an Accredited Investor, as that term is defined in one or more of the other categories/paragraphs numbered herein.

9) Other ERISA Plan. An employee benefit plan within the meaning of Title I of the ERISA Act other than a participant-directed plan with total assets in excess of $5 million or for which investment decisions (including the decision to purchase an interest) are made by a bank, registered investment adviser, savings and loan association, or insurance company.

10) Government Benefit Plan. A plan established and maintained by a state, municipality, or any agency of a state or municipality, for the benefit of its employees, with total assets in excess of $5 million.

11) Non-Profit Entity. An organization described in Section 501(c)(3) of the Internal Revenue Code, as amended, with total assets in excess of $5 million (including endowment, annuity and life income funds), as shown by the organization’s most recent audited financial statements.

12) A bank, as defined in Section 3(a)(2) of the Securities Act (whether acting for its own account or in a fiduciary capacity).

13) A savings and loan association or similar institution, as defined in Section 3(a)(5)(A) of the Securities Act (whether acting for its own account or in a fiduciary capacity).

14) A broker-dealer registered under the Exchange Act.

15) An insurance company, as defined in Section 2(13) of the Securities Act.

16) A “business development company,” as defined in Section 2(a)(48) of the Investment Company Act.

17) A small business investment company licensed under Section 301 (c) or (d) of the Small Business Investment Act of 1958.

18) A “private business development company” as defined in Section 202(a)(22) of the Advisers Act.

19) Executive Officer or Director. A natural person who is an executive officer, director or general partner of the Partnership or the General Partner, and is an Accredited Investor as that term is defined in one or more of the categories/paragraphs numbered herein.

20) Entity Owned Entirely By Accredited Investors. A corporation, partnership, private investment company or similar entity each of whose equity owners is a natural person who is an Accredited Investor, as that term is defined in one or more of the categories/paragraphs numbered herein.

Please read the notice above and check the box below to continue.

Nevis Office

Main Street
Hunkins Waterfront Plaza
Charlestown, Nevis

New York Office

Coming Soon!

Market Coverage